Judges: WHITLOCK, J.
Filed: Jul. 05, 1793
Latest Update: Mar. 03, 2020
Summary: If the defendant had pleaded a release of the assumpsit , and the plaintiff had pleaded a request, which had been found for him, the declaration would have been well, by admission. Still the declaration is the ground of the suit, and if it is bad, no subsequent plea will make it well. But in debt a licet saepius requisitus is sufficient, for it is not traversable, because the delivering of the declaration, which is a proecipe , is a *sufficient demand. 30 El. rot., 464; Old and Eastgrew's case;
Summary: If the defendant had pleaded a release of the assumpsit , and the plaintiff had pleaded a request, which had been found for him, the declaration would have been well, by admission. Still the declaration is the ground of the suit, and if it is bad, no subsequent plea will make it well. But in debt a licet saepius requisitus is sufficient, for it is not traversable, because the delivering of the declaration, which is a proecipe , is a *sufficient demand. 30 El. rot., 464; Old and Eastgrew's case; T..
More
If the defendant had pleaded a release of the assumpsit, and the plaintiff had pleaded a request, which had been found for him, the declaration would have been well, by admission. Still the declaration is the ground of the suit, and if it is bad, no subsequent plea will make it well. But in debt a licet saepius requisitus is sufficient, for it is not traversable, because the delivering of the declaration, which is aproecipe, is a *sufficient demand. 30 El. rot., 464; Old and Eastgrew'scase; Tr. 16 Jac. rot., 268. A special request ought to have been laid. Jones, 86; 3 Bulst., 297; Bendl., 157, 162; Poph., 160; Vin., 112; Hut., 73; Roll., 476; 3 Cr., 386; 3 Leon., 200.
