Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HUMPHREY v. HOLDER, 10-2153-CM. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Kansas Number: infdco20120201892 Visitors: 4
Filed: Jan. 31, 2012
Latest Update: Jan. 31, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KAREN M. HUMPHREYS, Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the court on Mark B. Rockwell's motion to withdraw from representing plaintiff in this case and for a temporary stay of proceedings. (Doc. 54). Mr. Rockwell supports his motion with a letter from his doctor recommending that he "cease involvement in" this case because of medical concerns. Plaintiff does not object to Mr. Rockwell's request to withdraw. Based on the doctor's recommendation, Mr. Rockwell's motion
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

KAREN M. HUMPHREYS, Magistrate Judge.

This matter is before the court on Mark B. Rockwell's motion to withdraw from representing plaintiff in this case and for a temporary stay of proceedings. (Doc. 54). Mr. Rockwell supports his motion with a letter from his doctor recommending that he "cease involvement in" this case because of medical concerns. Plaintiff does not object to Mr. Rockwell's request to withdraw.

Based on the doctor's recommendation, Mr. Rockwell's motion shall be GRANTED. However, Mr. Humphrey is admonished that discovery is complete and this matter is ready for the entry of a final pretrial order. The stay is for a limited period of time and Mr. Humphrey is strongly encouraged to secure the services of counsel as soon as possible to protect his legal interests. Further extensions of time will not be granted absent extraordinary circumstances.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Mr. Rockwell's motion to withdraw from representing plaintiff (Doc. 54) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a temporary stay is imposed to allow Mr. Humphrey time to hire new counsel. The stay will expire on April 16, 2012 and it is imperative that new counsel promptly enter his or her appearance to protect Mr. Humphrey's legal interests in this case.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to file objections to the order denying his motion for reconsideration (Doc. 97) is GRANTED. The deadline for filing an appeal of the order is April 16, 2012.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer