U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 99-10092-MLB. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20120207937
Visitors: 41
Filed: Feb. 06, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2012
Summary: Memorandum and Order MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. Defendant Craig Williams filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in his term of imprisonment based on the retroactive Sentence Guidelines following the adoption of Amendment 750. (Doc. 108). The Court denied his motion. (Doc. 109). Williams has filed a Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 110). The Tenth Circuit ruled that no certificate of appealability is required for an appeal taken from a motion under
Summary: Memorandum and Order MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. Defendant Craig Williams filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in his term of imprisonment based on the retroactive Sentence Guidelines following the adoption of Amendment 750. (Doc. 108). The Court denied his motion. (Doc. 109). Williams has filed a Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 110). The Tenth Circuit ruled that no certificate of appealability is required for an appeal taken from a motion under 1..
More
Memorandum and Order
MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge.
Defendant Craig Williams filed a motion pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) for a reduction in his term of imprisonment based on the retroactive Sentence Guidelines following the adoption of Amendment 750. (Doc. 108). The Court denied his motion. (Doc. 109). Williams has filed a Motion for Certificate of Appealability. (Doc. 110). The Tenth Circuit ruled that no certificate of appealability is required for an appeal taken from a motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. United States v. Randall, 2011 WL 6008983 at *4 n. 4 (10th Cir. Dec. 2, 2011). Williams' motion is denied as moot.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
