U.S. v. FORD, 12-40039-01-RDR. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20120427b68
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge. NOW on this 27 th day of April, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting additional time of three (3) weeks to file motions. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises. The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as provide
Summary: ORDER RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge. NOW on this 27 th day of April, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting additional time of three (3) weeks to file motions. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises. The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as provided..
More
ORDER
RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge.
NOW on this 27th day of April, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting additional time of three (3) weeks to file motions. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises.
The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as provided for in 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7). See United States v. Toombs, ___ F.3d ___, 2009 WL 2357228 (10th Cir. 2009).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the accused shall have additional time up to and including May 22, 2012 to file motions in the above-entitled action, and the government shall have until June 1, 2012 to file responses. The hearing on said motions shall be rescheduled for June 14, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The period of delay resulting from such continuance shall be excludable time as provided for by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7).
Source: Leagle
