Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. NEIGHBORS, 07-20124-CM. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Kansas Number: infdco20120626h25 Visitors: 27
Filed: Jun. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Jun. 26, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER CARLOS MURGUIA, District Judge. This matter is before the court on Defendant's Petition for Production of Ministerial Grand Jury Records. (Doc. 552). I. Factual Background Defendant was convicted of conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States, wire fraud, money laundering, and aiding and abetting on September 22, 2010. On April 19, 2012, Defendant filed a Petition for Production of Ministerial Grand Jury Records in accordance with the Freedom of Informa
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

CARLOS MURGUIA, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on Defendant's Petition for Production of Ministerial Grand Jury Records. (Doc. 552).

I. Factual Background

Defendant was convicted of conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud the United States, wire fraud, money laundering, and aiding and abetting on September 22, 2010. On April 19, 2012, Defendant filed a Petition for Production of Ministerial Grand Jury Records in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), and Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 and 34. Defendant claims she is entitled to these documents so that she can accurately prepare her motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.

II. Discussion

Although there is no per se rule against the disclosure of grand jury documents, the defendant must show a "particularized need" for the documents, in which case the documents "should be disclosed in a discrete and limited manner." United States v. Troutman, 814 F.2d 1428, 1453 (10th Cir. 1987). Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) prohibits the disclosure of grand jury documents with limited exceptions. The test of whether disclosure of information will violate Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) is "whether revelation in the particular context would in fact reveal what was before the grand jury." Anaya v. United States, 815 F.2d 1373, 1379 (10th Cir. 1987) (quoting Fund for Constitutional Gov't v. Nat'l Archives & Records Serv., 656 F.2d 856, 871 (D.C. Cir. 1981)). Disclosure is not permitted if the documents reveal "at the very least, the direction of the grand jury's investigation, and the names of the persons involved. ..." Id.

All of the documents defendant requests include information of which Fed. R. Crim. P. 6(e) prohibits disclosure, and she has failed to show a "particularized need" for the documents. In addition, the FOIA does not apply to the United States courts. Hodges v. United States Att'y Gen., No. 07-3076-SAC, 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10968, at *2 (D. Kan. Feb. 13, 2008) (citing Cook v. Willingham, 400 F.2d 885 (10th Cir. 1968)). It is a well-established rule "that grand jury proceedings are privileged and exempt from disclosure under the FOIA." Id. at *1 (citing John Doe Agency v. John Doe Corp., 493 U.S. 146, 152 (1989)). Defendant also requests the documents under Fed. R. Civ. P. 33 and 34. However, both rules apply during discovery, and therefore would not apply to a post-trial request for documents.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Defendant's Petition for Production of Ministerial Grand Jury Records is denied.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer