Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. HERNANDEZ, 12-40073-01-RDR. (2012)

Court: District Court, D. Kansas Number: infdco20120712994 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 11, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge. NOW on this 11 th day of July, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting two (2) weeks' additional time to file motions herein. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises. The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as provi
More

ORDER

RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge.

NOW on this 11th day of July, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting two (2) weeks' additional time to file motions herein. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises.

The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as provided for in 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7). See United States v. Toombs, ___ F.3d ___, 2009 WL 2357228 (10th Cir. 2009).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the accused shall have additional time up to and including July 26, 2012 to file motions in the above-entitled action, and the government shall have until August 6, 2012 to file responses. The hearing on said motions shall be rescheduled for August 14, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The period of delay resulting from such continuance shall be excludable time as provided for by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer