U.S. v. PANTOJA-JUAREZ, 12-40077-01-RDR. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20120724887
Visitors: 8
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: ORDER RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge. NOW on this 23 rd day of July, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting additional time of thirty (30) days to file motions herein. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises. The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as
Summary: ORDER RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge. NOW on this 23 rd day of July, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting additional time of thirty (30) days to file motions herein. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises. The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as p..
More
ORDER
RICHARD D. ROGERS, District Judge.
NOW on this 23rd day of July, 2012, the above-entitled matter comes before the Court upon the motion of counsel for the accused for an order granting additional time of thirty (30) days to file motions herein. The Court has reviewed the motion and is fully advised of the premises.
The Court further finds that the reasons set forth in the motion justify a delay, and that the additional time granted pursuant to this Order shall be excludable time as provided for in 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7). See United States v. Toombs, 574 F.3d 1262 (10th Cir. 2009).
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the accused shall have additional time up to and including August 24, 2012 to file motions in the above-entitled action, and the government shall have until September 3, 2012 to file responses. The motions hearing/status conference shall be held on September 13, 2012 at 9:30 a.m. The period of delay resulting from such continuance shall be excludable time as provided for by the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7).
Source: Leagle
