U.S. v. RAIFSNIDER, 04-10255-01 (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20140925b81
Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 24, 2014
Latest Update: Sep. 24, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. This case comes before the court on defendant's notice to examine the records and dismiss the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). (Doc. 97). The motion has been fully briefed. (Doc. 99). 1 The procedural history of this case is set out in the government's response and this court's prior orders. 2 (Docs. 59, 85, 99). Defendant's motion seeks to challenge this court's jurisdiction and authority to impose a sentence. Defendant's mo
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. This case comes before the court on defendant's notice to examine the records and dismiss the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). (Doc. 97). The motion has been fully briefed. (Doc. 99). 1 The procedural history of this case is set out in the government's response and this court's prior orders. 2 (Docs. 59, 85, 99). Defendant's motion seeks to challenge this court's jurisdiction and authority to impose a sentence. Defendant's mot..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on defendant's notice to examine the records and dismiss the action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). (Doc. 97). The motion has been fully briefed. (Doc. 99).1
The procedural history of this case is set out in the government's response and this court's prior orders.2 (Docs. 59, 85, 99). Defendant's motion seeks to challenge this court's jurisdiction and authority to impose a sentence. Defendant's motion may, or may not, be a second and subsequent motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. If it is, he has not applied for or received a certificate of appealability from the Tenth Circuit and accordingly, this court has no jurisdiction to consider the motion. In the unlikely event that this court does have jurisdiction, the motion would be denied as facially and legally frivolous.
The clerk is directed not to file any further pro se motions or other submissions from defendant unless authorized by a judge of this court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FootNotes
1. Defendant has not filed a reply and the time for doing so has now passed.
2. Defendant was charged and entered guilty pleas in two cases, 04-10255 and 05-10052. This motion only refers to the 04-10255 case.
Source: Leagle
