U.S. v. PARK, 12-20083-11-KHV. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20150414902
Visitors: 12
Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL , District Judge . Defendant's pro se letter (Doc. #1792) filed February 21, 2015, which the Court construes as a pro se motion for transcripts, is overruled because defendant is represented by counsel who did not sign the motion. See United States v. Sandoval-DeLao, 283 Fed. Appx. 621, 625 (10th Cir. 2008) (no error in refusal to consider pro se motion when defendant represented by counsel); United States v. Castellon, 218 Fed. Appx. 775, 780 (10
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL , District Judge . Defendant's pro se letter (Doc. #1792) filed February 21, 2015, which the Court construes as a pro se motion for transcripts, is overruled because defendant is represented by counsel who did not sign the motion. See United States v. Sandoval-DeLao, 283 Fed. Appx. 621, 625 (10th Cir. 2008) (no error in refusal to consider pro se motion when defendant represented by counsel); United States v. Castellon, 218 Fed. Appx. 775, 780 (10t..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge.
Defendant's pro se letter (Doc. #1792) filed February 21, 2015, which the Court construes as a pro se motion for transcripts, is overruled because defendant is represented by counsel who did not sign the motion. See United States v. Sandoval-DeLao, 283 Fed. Appx. 621, 625 (10th Cir. 2008) (no error in refusal to consider pro se motion when defendant represented by counsel); United States v. Castellon, 218 Fed. Appx. 775, 780 (10th Cir. 2007) (if criminal defendant represented by counsel, court does not accept pro se filings or allegations); United States v. McKinley, 58 F.3d 1475, 1480 (10th Cir. 1995) (no constitutional right to "hybrid form of representation").
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
