Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Lewis, 18-10106-01-EFM. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Kansas Number: infdco20200206a26 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 05, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 05, 2020
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COMPETENCY EVALUATION ERIC F. MELGREN , District Judge . On January 3, 2020, the Court ordered the parties in this matter to meet and confer to stipulate to an agreed upon medical provider to conduct the competency evaluation the Court ordered for Addison Lewis. (Doc. 73, Memo. and Order). On February 3, 2020, the parties notified the Court by email they had agreed upon using the services of Jarrod S. Steffan, Ph. D., a licensed or certified psychologist, who indicated
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER COMPETENCY EVALUATION

On January 3, 2020, the Court ordered the parties in this matter to meet and confer to stipulate to an agreed upon medical provider to conduct the competency evaluation the Court ordered for Addison Lewis. (Doc. 73, Memo. and Order).

On February 3, 2020, the parties notified the Court by email they had agreed upon using the services of Jarrod S. Steffan, Ph. D., a licensed or certified psychologist, who indicated to the parties his report would take 30 days to complete once he had all the records, and performed the examination.

It is hereby ORDERED, pursuant to Title 18, U.S.C. §§ 4241 and 4247(b), that the parties coordinate the examination of Addison Lewis with Dr. Steffan, and that a report of his findings be supplied to the Court within 30 days of the date of that examination.

It is also ORDERED that the costs of Dr. Steffan's services be paid by the United States, pursuant to Department of Justice policy, Justice Manual, Section 3-8.520 (C) (Feb. 2018), and the Guide to Judiciary Policies and Procedures, Vol. 7, § § 320.20(b); 320.40(b) and 320.20.60(a)(1). See also United States v. Weathers, 374 F.Supp.2d 957, 959-60 (D.N.M. 2004).

A status hearing is set for March 16, 2020 at 9:15 a.m. in Judge' Chambers, Room 414, to keep track of the progress of this examination and report.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion Brief, Doc. 75, and Defendant's Motion Brief, Doc. 78, are hereby GRANTED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer