Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Irvine v. Old Kentucky Distillery, (1924)

Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) Number:  Visitors: 6
Judges: OPINION OF THE COURT BY COMMISSIONER SANDIDGE
Attorneys: MATTHEW O'DOHERTY and W.W. THUM for appellant. HUMPHREY, CRAWFORD MIDDLETON for appellees.
Filed: Dec. 16, 1924
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Affirming. We are controlled in the settlement of the questions presented by this appeal by our opinion today, handed down in O.H. Irvine v. Old Kentucky Distillery and Joseph J. Sass. While the two cases were never consolidated, by agreement they were tried upon the same evidence. The facts of the two cases differ only in that O.H. Irvine and R.H. Irvine owned different amounts of the capital stock of the corporation, with the consequent difference in the amount sought to be recovered. In the s
More

Affirming.

We are controlled in the settlement of the questions presented by this appeal by our opinion today, handed down in O.H. Irvine v. Old Kentucky Distillery and Joseph J. Sass. While the two cases were never consolidated, by agreement they were tried upon the same evidence. The facts of the two cases differ only in that O.H. Irvine and R.H. Irvine owned different amounts of the capital stock of the corporation, with the consequent difference in the amount sought to be recovered. In the sale of the stock to appellee, Joseph J. Sass, O.H. Irvine acted both for himself and for his brother, this appellant, R.H. Irvine.

For the reasons indicated in the former opinion the judgment herein is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer