Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gilmore and Helm v. Brown, (1926)

Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) Number:  Visitors: 18
Judges: OPINION OF THE COURT BY DRURY, COMMISSIONER
Attorneys: JOHN IRICK and JOSEPH S. LAWTON for appellants. BECKHAM OVERSTREET, G.F. WYCOFF and CLARENCE BEATTY for appellee.
Filed: Jun. 11, 1926
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Dismissing. The appellee recovered a judgment against the appellants for $225.00. An appeal to this court was granted by the court below. The appellants superseded the judgment there, and have prosecuted that appeal. Where the amount in controversy is less than $500.00 *Page 101 the trial court is without jurisdiction to grant an appeal, and a supersedeas bond executed in such cases is void. See Childers v. Ratliff, 164 Ky. 123 , 175 S.W. 25 ; Davis, et al. v. Davis, et al., 178 Ky. 779 , 199 S.
More

Dismissing.

The appellee recovered a judgment against the appellants for $225.00. An appeal to this court was granted by the court below. The appellants superseded the judgment there, and have prosecuted that appeal. Where the amount in controversy is less than $500.00 *Page 101 the trial court is without jurisdiction to grant an appeal, and a supersedeas bond executed in such cases is void. See Childers v. Ratliff, 164 Ky. 123, 175 S.W. 25; Davis, et al. v. Davis, et al., 178 Ky. 779, 199 S.W. 1075; Frazier v. Ison, 194 Ky. 550, 240 S.W. 39.

It has been held, however, that when a record is duly filed in the office of the Court of Appeals, and no appeal was prayed in the court below, the filing of the record will be treated as including a motion that the court grant an appeal, although no motion asking for such an appeal is filed with the record. See City of Covington v. Sullivan, 172 Ky. 534, 189 S.W. 709; Carter Co. Com. Bank v. Eifort, 179 Ky. 232, 200 S.W. 342. Where an unauthorized appeal has been granted by the circuit court, a party may abandon his appeal thus improperly granted and apply to the Court of Appeals for an appeal, by motion as required by the statute; and the filing of the record without a motion for an appeal, or the grant of an appeal by the clerk of the Court of Appeals, will be treated as a motion for an appeal as required by the statute. See Matney v. Edwards,179 Ky. 243, 200 S.W. 366; Searcy v. Golden, 180 Ky. 324,202 S.W. 486.

If the appellant here had filed this record with the clerk of the Court of Appeals and had taken process from this court against the appellee, this would have been treated as an abandonment of the appeal attempted to be granted below, but no such step was taken in this case. The steps taken in this case are identical with the steps taken in the case of Julian v. United Clothing Store, 180 Ky. 653, 203 S.W. 549. Much that is said above is taken from section 16 of Miller's Appellate Practice, where a more elaborate discussion will be found. Parties desiring to appeal from judgments less than $500.00 should file the record with the clerk of the Court of Appeals, should take process from this court, and if they desire to supersede the judgment the bond should be made here and the supersedeas issued by the clerk of this court. Motion for an appeal should also be made here, though, as we have seen, this is not absolutely necessary if the other steps be taken as indicated.

See also rule X of this court.

Thus we see that this court has no jurisdiction of this appeal, and it is dismissed. *Page 102

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer