Napier v. Commonwealth, (1928)
Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Number:
Visitors: 3
Judges: OPINION OF THE COURT BY COMMISSIONER STANLEY
Attorneys: F.M. JONES for appellant.
J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General, and GEO. H. MITCHELL, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
Filed: Nov. 13, 1928
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Reversing. These two appeals will be considered in one opinion. The defendant was convicted under two indictments of violating the prohibition law, which indictments are identical *Page 225 with that considered in the case of Middleton v. Commonwealth (Ky.) 10 S.W.2d _, this day decided, and both judgments are reversed for the reason stated in that opinion.
Reversing.
These two appeals will be considered in one opinion. The defendant was convicted under two indictments of violating the prohibition law, which indictments are identical
with that considered in the case of Middleton v. Commonwealth (Ky.) 10 S.W.2d ___, this day decided, and both judgments are reversed for the reason stated in that opinion.
Source: CourtListener
