Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Commonwealth v. Ryan, (1930)

Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) Number:  Visitors: 20
Judges: OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUDGE WILLIS
Attorneys: J.W. CAMMACK, Attorney General, GEORGE H. MITCHELL, Assistant Attorney General, and E.E. BELL for appellant. J.M. KENNEDY for appellee.
Filed: Oct. 28, 1930
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Affirming. This is a companion case to that of the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Josh Bates, 235 Ky. 763 , 31 S.W. _ this day decided. Inasmuch as the facts and issues in each proceeding were the same, it is not necessary to repeat the discussion found in the Bates case. Upon the reasoning and authority of that case, like result must be reached in this one. The judgment is affirmed.

Affirming.

This is a companion case to that of the Commonwealth of Kentucky v. Josh Bates, 235 Ky. 763, 31 S.W. ___ this day decided. Inasmuch as the facts and issues in each proceeding were the same, it is not necessary to repeat the discussion found in the Bates case. Upon the reasoning and authority of that case, like result must be reached in this one.

The judgment is affirmed.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer