Monohan v. Moorman, (1932)
Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Number:
Visitors: 9
Judges: OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUDGE WILLIS
Attorneys: FAUREST FAUREST for appellants.
JAMES T BASHAM for appellee.
Filed: May 10, 1932
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Affirming. This is a companion case to Monohan et al. v. Grayson County Supply Company 245 Ky. 781 , 49 S.W.2d _, this day decided, and upon the authority of the opinion in that case, and for reason therein stated, the judgment in this case cannot be disturbed. The judgment is affirmed. *Page 790
Affirming.
This is a companion case to Monohan et al. v. Grayson County Supply Company 245 Ky. 781, 49 S.W.2d ___, this day decided, and upon the authority of the opinion in that case, and for reason therein stated, the judgment in this case cannot be disturbed.
The judgment is affirmed.
Source: CourtListener
