Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Nichols v. Marks, (1948)

Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) Number:  Visitors: 14
Judges: OPINION OF THE COURT BY JUDGE LATIMER
Attorneys: Paul Mansfield for appellants. A.E. Funk, Jr. for appellees.
Filed: Dec. 17, 1948
Latest Update: Mar. 02, 2020
Summary: Affirming. The City of Lexington-Fayette County Board of Health, authorized and directed its Secretary to place Dr. E.M. Thompson, Health Officer, on the payroll as of June 1, 1948, at the increased salary of $708.33 per mouth. Appellants, believing this to be violative of Section 246 of the Constitution in that the increase creates a salary in excess of $5,000 per year, brought this action in Fayette Circuit Court seeking a declaration of rights. Upon consideration, the court below adjudged Dr.
More

In reality the same question is involved in this case as was involved in Pardue v. Miller, etc., 306 Ky. 110,206 S.W.2d 75, to wit, can one avoid the salary limitation of $5,000 imposed by Section 246 of our Constitution by being classified as an employee rather than as an officer?

It occurs to me that it will not be long before we have a dearth of officers and a plethora of employees serving in this Commonwealth should this Court continue to circumvent Section 246. It may come to pass at no too distant date that this Court will in one bold stroke say all persons rendering public service, except elective officers, are employees.

For the reason given in the dissent in the Pardue case I most respectfully dissent from the majority opinion here.

I am authorized to say that Judge Thomas concurs in this dissent.

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer