Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FUGATE v. KROGER GROUP INC., 11-347-KKC. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky Number: infdco20120309e02 Visitors: 8
Filed: Feb. 16, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2012
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. [DE 7]. The Plaintiffs' filed a Motion to Amend Complaint [DE 6] to add additional non-diverse defendants. At the same time, the Plaintiffs' filed a Motion to Remand because if their Motion to Amend was granted, there would no longer be complete diversity and this Court would lack subject-matter jurisdiction. Kroger objected to the Motion to Amend and the Motio
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

KAREN K. CALDWELL, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand. [DE 7]. The Plaintiffs' filed a Motion to Amend Complaint [DE 6] to add additional non-diverse defendants. At the same time, the Plaintiffs' filed a Motion to Remand because if their Motion to Amend was granted, there would no longer be complete diversity and this Court would lack subject-matter jurisdiction.

Kroger objected to the Motion to Amend and the Motion to Remand, but did not clearly state its legal grounds for the objection. [DE 15]. The Court granted the Motion to Amend. [DE 16]. The Plaintiffs then filed their First Amended Complaint stating that the new named Defendants are citizens of Kentucky. [DE 17 at 2-3]. Absent a clear legal objection to the Motion to Remand stating the grounds in opposition, the Court will GRANT the Motion to Remand because complete diversity no longer exists.

It is ORDERED that:

1) Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand [DE 7] is GRANTED; 2) This action is remanded back to the Powell County Circuit Court for further proceedings; and 3) This matter is STRICKEN from the DOCKET.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer