MINIARD v. COLVIN, 100 (WOB-CJS). (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20140630c33
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 27, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 27, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, Sr., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), and there being no objections filed thereto, the Court being advised, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #16) is denied ; and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #12)
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, Sr., District Judge. This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), and there being no objections filed thereto, the Court being advised, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #16) is denied ; and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #12) i..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, Sr., District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (Doc. #17), and there being no objections filed thereto, the Court being advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is hereby adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that defendant's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #16) is denied; and that plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Doc. #12) is granted in part as to plaintiff's request for a reversal of the Commissioner's decision and remand, and denied in part to the extent plaintiff requests a court-ordered award of benefits; and that the Decision is reversed and the matter is remanded to the Commissioner under Sentence four of 42 U.S.C. §405(g), with instructions to reconsider and adequately explain the treatment of the opinions of Dr. Sharma and Dr. Lynch; and that a separate Judgment shall enter concurrently herewith.
Source: Leagle
