U.S. v. RENFRO, 08-93-ART-CJS-(2). (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20170420b79
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 19, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 19, 2017
Summary: ORDER AMUL R. THAPAR , District Judge . Darrin Renfro moves to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. R. 190. In his motion, Renfro argues that his lawyer was constitutionally ineffective by failing to request two reductions to Renfro's sentence—one for playing a minor role in the offense and the other for accepting responsibility. Id. at 1-4. Renfro also asks the Court to reduce his sentence for his "post-sentence rehabilitation" efforts. Id. at 4-5. Magistrate Judge Candace
Summary: ORDER AMUL R. THAPAR , District Judge . Darrin Renfro moves to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2255. R. 190. In his motion, Renfro argues that his lawyer was constitutionally ineffective by failing to request two reductions to Renfro's sentence—one for playing a minor role in the offense and the other for accepting responsibility. Id. at 1-4. Renfro also asks the Court to reduce his sentence for his "post-sentence rehabilitation" efforts. Id. at 4-5. Magistrate Judge Candace ..
More
ORDER
AMUL R. THAPAR, District Judge.
Darrin Renfro moves to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. R. 190. In his motion, Renfro argues that his lawyer was constitutionally ineffective by failing to request two reductions to Renfro's sentence—one for playing a minor role in the offense and the other for accepting responsibility. Id. at 1-4. Renfro also asks the Court to reduce his sentence for his "post-sentence rehabilitation" efforts. Id. at 4-5. Magistrate Judge Candace J. Smith has reviewed Renfro's motion and filed a Report and Recommendation (R&R) that the Court deny Renfro's motion as untimely—explaining that Section 2255's one-year statute of limitations ran over six years ago. R. 194 at 6-7; see 28 U.S.C. § 2255(f). Neither Renfro nor the United States has filed any objections to the R&R, and the time to do so has expired. See Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2).
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the R&R, R. 194, is ADOPTED as the opinion of the Court. Renfro's motion to vacate his sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, R. 190, is DENIED. The Court will issue a separate judgment.
Source: Leagle
