Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gueye v. Strauss, 16-37-DLB-EBA. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky Number: infdco20170803d78 Visitors: 12
Filed: Aug. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DAVID L. BUNNING , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. # 47), wherein he recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 23), deny Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. # 15), grant Defendants' motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigator (Doc. # 24), and deny Plaintiff's motion for consideration and motion for a st
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Edward B. Atkins's Report and Recommendation (R&R) (Doc. # 47), wherein he recommends that the Court grant Defendants' motion for summary judgment (Doc. # 23), deny Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief (Doc. # 15), grant Defendants' motion to declare Plaintiff a vexatious litigator (Doc. # 24), and deny Plaintiff's motion for consideration and motion for a stay pending appeal (Doc. # 46). (Doc. # 47). Plaintiff filed no objections to the R&R and the time for filing objections has expired1, so the R&R is ripe for review. The Court having reviewed the R&R and finding it sound in all respects, the Court will adopt the R&R as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Court.

Accordingly, for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's R&R,

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows:

(1) Magistrate Judge Atkins's R&R (Doc. # 47) is hereby ADOPTED as the findings of facts and conclusions of law of the Court;

(2) Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. # 23) is GRANTED;

(3) Plaintiff's Motion for Injunctive Relief (Doc. # 15) is DENIED;

(4) Defendants' Motion to Declare Plaintiff a Vexatious Litigator (Doc. # 24) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ENJOINED from filing any future pro se civil actions in this Court without the prior written authorization of the Court. The Clerk of the Court SHALL REFUSE to file or docket any civil complaint-regardless of how styled or the basis for the relief sought-unless the Court authorizes the filing of such action. To obtain such authorization, Gueye must:

Send a one-page letter to the Court requesting permission to file suit;

(b) Include a typewritten complaint, or a form Civil Rights Complaint [EDKY Form 520], which must describe the facts of his case and his claims with reasonable particularity; and

(c) Pay the required fees, or file a form Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit [AO Form 249];

(5) Plaintiff's Motion for Consideration and Motion for Stay Pending Appeal (Doc. # 46) is DENIED;

(6) For the reasons set forth in the R&R, the Court determines there would be no arguable merit for an appeal in this matter and, therefore, no certificate of appealability shall issue; and

(7) This action is DISMISSED with prejudice and STRICKEN from the docket.

FootNotes


1. Based on the Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court allowed him a few extra days in which to file objections to the R&R. The deadline would have been July 24, 2017. Despite giving him additional time, no objections have been filed.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer