U.S. v. Malone, 6:17-CR-67-S-GFVT-HAI-3. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20180611748
Visitors: 15
Filed: Jun. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of Acceptance of Guilty Plea filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [R. 174.] The recommendation instructed the parties to file any specific written objections within three days after being served with the decision, or else waive the right to further review. [ See id. at 3.] Neither party has objected to the Magistrate's recommendation, and the time to do so has now pas
Summary: ORDER GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of Acceptance of Guilty Plea filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [R. 174.] The recommendation instructed the parties to file any specific written objections within three days after being served with the decision, or else waive the right to further review. [ See id. at 3.] Neither party has objected to the Magistrate's recommendation, and the time to do so has now pass..
More
ORDER
GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Recommendation of Acceptance of Guilty Plea filed by United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram. [R. 174.] The recommendation instructed the parties to file any specific written objections within three days after being served with the decision, or else waive the right to further review. [See id. at 3.] Neither party has objected to the Magistrate's recommendation, and the time to do so has now passed. Defendant Malone did file a consent to plead before the United States Magistrate Judge. [R. 172.]
Upon review, the Court is satisfied that Defendant David Malone knowingly and competently pled guilty to the charged offense and that an adequate factual basis supports the plea as to each essential element of the offense charged. Accordingly, the Court hereby ORDERS as follows:
1. Judge Ingram's Recommendation of Acceptance of Guilty Plea [R. 174] is ADOPTED as and for the Opinion of the Court;
2. Defendant David Malone is ADJUDGED guilty of Count One of the Superseding Indictment;
3. The Defendant's Jury Trial is CANCELLED; and
4. A Sentencing Order has been entered setting Defendant's sentencing date.
Source: Leagle
