Mullins v. Berryhill, 7:18-cv-002-JMH. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20190919890
Visitors: 4
Filed: Sep. 18, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT JOSEPH M. HOOD , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith, Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Defendant Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's disability claim is AFFIRMED ; (2) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendant Commissioner; (3) All remaining claims for relief or pending motions are DENIED AS
Summary: JUDGMENT JOSEPH M. HOOD , District Judge . In accordance with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith, Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: (1) Defendant Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's disability claim is AFFIRMED ; (2) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendant Commissioner; (3) All remaining claims for relief or pending motions are DENIED AS ..
More
JUDGMENT
JOSEPH M. HOOD, District Judge.
In accordance with the Court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered contemporaneously herewith, Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, and pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g),
IT IS ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows:
(1) Defendant Commissioner's decision denying Plaintiff's disability claim is AFFIRMED;
(2) Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Defendant Commissioner;
(3) All remaining claims for relief or pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT;
(4) This matter is DISMISSED and STRICKEN from the Court's active docket; and
(5) This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment, and there is no just cause for delay.
Source: Leagle
