Farris v. Saul, 7:18-cv-00073-GFVT. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20200317a64
Visitors: 25
Filed: Mar. 16, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2020
Summary: JUDGMENT GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE , District Judge . In accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Social Security Administration with respect to all issues raised herein; 2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no cause for delay; 3. Al
Summary: JUDGMENT GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE , District Judge . In accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 405(g), it is hereby ORDERED as follows: 1. The administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Social Security Administration with respect to all issues raised herein; 2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no cause for delay; 3. All..
More
JUDGMENT
GREGORY F. VAN TATENHOVE, District Judge.
In accordance with Rule 58 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), it is hereby ORDERED as follows:
1. The administrative decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED and Judgment is ENTERED in favor of the Social Security Administration with respect to all issues raised herein;
2. This is a FINAL and APPEALABLE Judgment and there is no cause for delay;
3. All issues properly raised herein having been resolved, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice; and
4. This matter is STRICKEN from the Court's active docket.
Source: Leagle
