Smith v. Litteral, 2017-04-WOB. (2020)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20200318b18
Visitors: 19
Filed: Mar. 17, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 17, 2020
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [26] of the Magistrate Judge, and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner [27], and the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the petition for re
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [26] of the Magistrate Judge, and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner [27], and the Court being sufficiently advised, IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the petition for rel..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation [26] of the Magistrate Judge, and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by Petitioner [27], and the Court being sufficiently advised,
IT IS ORDERED that the objections be, and they hereby are, overruled; that the Report and Recommendation be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; that the petition for relief under 28 U.S.C. 2254 be, and it hereby is, denied and this matter be, and hereby is dismissed with prejudice and stricken from the docket of this Court. No Certificate of Appealability shall issue herein.
A separate Judgment shall enter concurrently herewith.
Source: Leagle
