Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. FRANKES, 3:11CR-116-CRS. (2012)

Court: District Court, W.D. Kentucky Number: infdco20120406b02 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 05, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2012
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY DAVE WHALIN, Magistrate Judge. This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge by the District Court for the purpose of conducting proceedings pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. The appropriate wavier was executed by the defendant and filed in the record. The United States was represented by Mac Shannon, Assistant United States Attorney. The hearing was recorded by Dena Legg, Official Court Reporter. The defendant, Daniel Frakes
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION CONCERNING PLEA OF GUILTY

DAVE WHALIN, Magistrate Judge.

This matter has been referred to the undersigned Magistrate Judge by the District Court for the purpose of conducting proceedings pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 11. The appropriate wavier was executed by the defendant and filed in the record. The United States was represented by Mac Shannon, Assistant United States Attorney. The hearing was recorded by Dena Legg, Official Court Reporter. The defendant, Daniel Frakes, by consent with Stephen H. Miller, CJA appointed counsel, appeared in open court on March 8, 2012, and entered pleas of guilty as to Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment pursuant to a Rule 11(c)(1)(B) plea agreement. After cautioning and examining the defendant under oath concerning each of the subjects mentioned in Rule 11, the Court determined that the guilty pleas were knowledgeable and voluntary as to Counts 1 and 2 of the Indictment, and that the offenses charged were supported by an independent basis in fact concerning each of the essential elements of such offenses. Therefore, the undersigned recommends that the pleas of guilty be accepted, and that the defendant be adjudged guilty as to Counts 1 and 2 in the Indictment and have sentence imposed accordingly.

Sentencing will be set for Friday, May 25, 2012 at 1:30 p.m. before the Honorable Charles R. Simpson, III, United States District Court Judge.

The defendant shall have fourteen (14) days to file any objections to this recommendation pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 72(b), or waive the opportunity to do so.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the defendant shall remain under the terms of his present bond with the following additional condition:

The defendant is placed on a curfew and is restricted to his residence from 9:00 p.m. until 7:00 a.m. The defendant's supervising officer is allowed to modify the time frame of the curfew on a pre-approved basis according to the defendant's work schedule.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer