Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

WILLIAMS v. WHITE, 5:14-CV-00159-GNS-LLK. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Kentucky Number: infdco20160408o60 Visitors: 6
Filed: Apr. 07, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 07, 2016
Summary: MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GREG N. STIVERS , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jeremy White's Prisoner Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (DN 39). For the reasons stated herein, the motion is DENIED. I. BACKGROUND This action arises from Plaintiff Jeremy White's incarceration after being convicted of sexual abuse. (Def.'s Mot. to Dismiss 1, DN 15). Plaintiff's petition to the Oldham County Circuit Court had previously been
More

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

This matter is before the Court on Defendant Jeremy White's Prisoner Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (DN 39). For the reasons stated herein, the motion is DENIED.

I. BACKGROUND

This action arises from Plaintiff Jeremy White's incarceration after being convicted of sexual abuse. (Def.'s Mot. to Dismiss 1, DN 15). Plaintiff's petition to the Oldham County Circuit Court had previously been rejected because the court ruled he had failed to exhaust his administrative remedies and his detainment was justified. (Def.'s Mot. to Dismiss 2). Plaintiff petitioned this Court on August 18, 2014. (Pet. for Writ of Habeas Corpus 1, DN 1). On March 23, 2015, the Court dismissed Plaintiff's petition. (Order, DN 33). Plaintiff now seeks leave to appeal the Court's decision in forma pauperis.

II. DISCUSSION

The Court may allow an indigent defendant to proceed in forma pauperis, i.e., without prepayment of fees, provided that such person provide an affidavit disclosing his or her assets with a statement that the person is unable to pay the fees. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). In order to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, the affidavit must also contain a statement of the issues "that the party intends to present on appeal." Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(1)(c). Under this additional requirement, the Court must also ascertain the merits of the appeal. Callihan v. Schneider, 178 F.3d 800, 803 (6th Cir. 1999).

In this case, Plaintiff has not included in his application a statement of the issues he intends to pursue on appeal. Accordingly, he is not in compliance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 24, and his motion must be denied.

III. CONCLUSION

For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Prisoner Application to Proceed Without Prepayment of Fees and Affidavit (DN 39) is DENIED.

Plaintiff must either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fee to the Clerk of the District Court within 30 days of entry of this Order or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit within 30 days after service of this Order in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). See Kincade v. Sparkman, 117 F.3d 949, 952 (6th Cir. 1997). Should Plaintiff choose to pay the full $505.00 appellate filing fee rather than file a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis in the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, payment must be made payable to Clerk, U.S. District Court and sent to the following address:

United States District Court Western District of Kentucky 106 Gene Snyder Courthouse 601 West Broadway Louisville, KY 40202

Failure to pay the $505.00 filing fee or to file an application to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit within 30 days may result in dismissal of the appeal. A copy of this Order is being sent to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(4).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer