Lawson v. Saul, 3:19-CV-10-CRS. (2020)
Court: District Court, W.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20200319933
Visitors: 43
Filed: Mar. 18, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 18, 2020
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III , Senior District Judge . This court has reviewed the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (the "report") and conducted a de novo review of those portions of the report to which plaintiff Wendy Lawson objects, and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion entered herein this date, the objections (DN 25) are OVERRULED and the magistrate judge's report (DN 24) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED IN ITS E
Summary: ORDER CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III , Senior District Judge . This court has reviewed the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (the "report") and conducted a de novo review of those portions of the report to which plaintiff Wendy Lawson objects, and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion entered herein this date, the objections (DN 25) are OVERRULED and the magistrate judge's report (DN 24) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED IN ITS EN..
More
ORDER
CHARLES R. SIMPSON, III, Senior District Judge.
This court has reviewed the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge (the "report") and conducted a de novo review of those portions of the report to which plaintiff Wendy Lawson objects, and for the reasons set forth in the memorandum opinion entered herein this date, the objections (DN 25) are OVERRULED and the magistrate judge's report (DN 24) is ACCEPTED AND ADOPTED IN ITS ENTIRETY and incorporated by reference herein.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
