WHITENER v. PLIVA, INC., 10-1552. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20140423a66
Visitors: 4
Filed: Apr. 22, 2014
Latest Update: Apr. 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Baxter Healthcare Corporation's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Rec. Doc. 278), in response to which Plaintiffs Joshua Whitener, Sr. and Lindsey Whitener have filed a notice of lack of opposition (Rec. Doc. 284). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Baxter Healthcare's motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 278), which appears to be ground
Summary: ORDER ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendant Baxter Healthcare Corporation's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Rec. Doc. 278), in response to which Plaintiffs Joshua Whitener, Sr. and Lindsey Whitener have filed a notice of lack of opposition (Rec. Doc. 284). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Baxter Healthcare's motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 278), which appears to be grounde..
More
ORDER
ELDON E. FALLON, District Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant Baxter Healthcare Corporation's motion for summary judgment pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56 and entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) (Rec. Doc. 278), in response to which Plaintiffs Joshua Whitener, Sr. and Lindsey Whitener have filed a notice of lack of opposition (Rec. Doc. 284).
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that Baxter Healthcare's motion for summary judgment (Rec. Doc. 278), which appears to be grounded in both law and fact, is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, having expressly determined that there is no just reason for delay, an entry of judgment pursuant to Rule 54(b) shall be issued with regard to this order.
Source: Leagle
