ESTEEN v. LeBLANC, 13-5419. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20141203a99
Visitors: 16
Filed: Dec. 02, 2014
Latest Update: Dec. 02, 2014
Summary: ORDER SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. The Court, finding that as of this date neither party has filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, 1 hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion. Accordingly, defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to Esteen's Section 1983 claim for excessive force against Lieutenant Anthony Odom is GRANTED, and Esteen's claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent Esteen asserts a stat
Summary: ORDER SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge. The Court, finding that as of this date neither party has filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, 1 hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion. Accordingly, defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to Esteen's Section 1983 claim for excessive force against Lieutenant Anthony Odom is GRANTED, and Esteen's claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent Esteen asserts a state..
More
ORDER
SARAH S. VANCE, District Judge.
The Court, finding that as of this date neither party has filed any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation,1 hereby approves the Report and Recommendation and adopts it as its opinion.
Accordingly, defendant's motion for summary judgment with respect to Esteen's Section 1983 claim for excessive force against Lieutenant Anthony Odom is GRANTED, and Esteen's claim is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. To the extent Esteen asserts a state law battery claim under Louisiana law, it is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
FootNotes
1. R. Doc. 39.
Source: Leagle
