U.S. v. MOGAN, 14-40. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20151006e05
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Sep. 17, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DANIEL E. KNOWLES, III , Magistrate Judge . On March 30, 2015 and April 8, 2015, the District Court referred two petitions for adjudication of interest [Doc. #179 & #187] to this Court. The parties have resolved the petitions through joint stipulations that they have filed into the record. [Doc. #194 & #195]. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the District Court sign the orders attached to Doc #194 & #195. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conference set on Septe
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DANIEL E. KNOWLES, III , Magistrate Judge . On March 30, 2015 and April 8, 2015, the District Court referred two petitions for adjudication of interest [Doc. #179 & #187] to this Court. The parties have resolved the petitions through joint stipulations that they have filed into the record. [Doc. #194 & #195]. Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the District Court sign the orders attached to Doc #194 & #195. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conference set on Septem..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DANIEL E. KNOWLES, III, Magistrate Judge.
On March 30, 2015 and April 8, 2015, the District Court referred two petitions for adjudication of interest [Doc. #179 & #187] to this Court. The parties have resolved the petitions through joint stipulations that they have filed into the record. [Doc. #194 & #195]. Accordingly,
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the District Court sign the orders attached to Doc #194 & #195.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the conference set on September 21, 2015 is CANCELLED.
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT
Objections must be: (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1(a), 6(b) and 72(b). A party's failure to object bars that party from: (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district judge; and (2) appellate review of the un-objected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, except upon grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
Source: Leagle
