Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BRIDGES v. CITY OF NEW ORLEANS, 15-4640-LMA-SS. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20160106a47 Visitors: 9
Filed: Dec. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION SALLY SHUSHAN , District Judge . The plaintiff, Katrina Bridges on behalf of her minor child, K.B. ("Bridges"), filed a complaint against the City of New Orleans, City of New Orleans Mayor Mitchell "Mitch" J. Landrieu, the New Orleans Police Department, New Orleans Police Department Superintendent Michael S. Harrison and Terrance Saulny, for violation of the constitutional rights of her child. Rec. doc. 1. Mayor Landrieu, Superintendent Harrison and the City of Ne
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The plaintiff, Katrina Bridges on behalf of her minor child, K.B. ("Bridges"), filed a complaint against the City of New Orleans, City of New Orleans Mayor Mitchell "Mitch" J. Landrieu, the New Orleans Police Department, New Orleans Police Department Superintendent Michael S. Harrison and Terrance Saulny, for violation of the constitutional rights of her child. Rec. doc. 1. Mayor Landrieu, Superintendent Harrison and the City of New Orleans filed an answer to the complaint. Rec. doc. 6. Saulny was served, but he has not appeared. Rec. doc. 8.

The New Orleans Police Department filed a motion to dismiss the claims against it for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Rec. doc. 7. Bridges filed a motion to dismiss her claim against the New Orleans Police Department without prejudice. Rec. doc. 9. Both of these motions were referred to the undersigned.

RECOMMENDATION

Accordingly, IT IS RECOMMENDED that: (1) the motion of Bridges to dismiss the New Orleans Police Department without prejudice (Rec. doc. 9) be GRANTED; and (2) the motion of the New Orleans Police Department to dismiss for failure to state a claim upon which be granted (Rec. doc. 7) be DISMISSED as MOOT.

OBJECTIONS

A party's failure to file written objections to the proposed findings, conclusions and recommendations in a magistrate judge's report and recommendation within fourteen (14) calendar days after being served with a copy shall bar that party, except upon grounds of plain error, from attacking on appeal the unobjected-to proposed factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, provided that the party has been served with notice that such consequences will result from a failure to object. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer