ESTEP v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, 15-3764. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20160107788
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 16, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 16, 2015
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DANIEL E. KNOWLES, III , District Judge . Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff to Voluntarily Dismiss. [Doc. #14]. Having reviewed the motion, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion of Plaintiff to Voluntarily Dismiss [Doc. #14] be GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT Objections must be: (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served within fourteen (14) days
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION DANIEL E. KNOWLES, III , District Judge . Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff to Voluntarily Dismiss. [Doc. #14]. Having reviewed the motion, IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion of Plaintiff to Voluntarily Dismiss [Doc. #14] be GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2). NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT Objections must be: (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served within fourteen (14) days a..
More
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
DANIEL E. KNOWLES, III, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion of Plaintiff to Voluntarily Dismiss. [Doc. #14]. Having reviewed the motion,
IT IS RECOMMENDED that the Motion of Plaintiff to Voluntarily Dismiss [Doc. #14] be GRANTED, and plaintiff's complaint be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2).
NOTICE OF RIGHT TO OBJECT
Objections must be: (1) specific, (2) in writing, and (3) served within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of this report. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 1(a), 6(b) and 72(b). A party's failure to object bars that party from: (1) entitlement to de novo review by a district judge; and (2) appellate review of the un-objected-to factual findings and legal conclusions accepted by the district court, except upon grounds of plain error. Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1430 (5th Cir. 1996) (en banc).
Source: Leagle
