Wilson v. Evonik Corporation, 18-9836. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190307b19
Visitors: 9
Filed: Mar. 06, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2019
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL B. NORTH , Magistrate Judge . Local Rule 7.5 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana requires that memoranda in opposition to a motion be filed no later than eight days prior to the date set for submission of the motion. No memoranda in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (rec. doc. 7), set for submission on February 27, 2019, has been filed, timely or otherwise. Accordingly, the motion is deemed to be unopposed, and further, it appea
Summary: ORDER MICHAEL B. NORTH , Magistrate Judge . Local Rule 7.5 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana requires that memoranda in opposition to a motion be filed no later than eight days prior to the date set for submission of the motion. No memoranda in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (rec. doc. 7), set for submission on February 27, 2019, has been filed, timely or otherwise. Accordingly, the motion is deemed to be unopposed, and further, it appear..
More
ORDER
MICHAEL B. NORTH, Magistrate Judge.
Local Rule 7.5 of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana requires that memoranda in opposition to a motion be filed no later than eight days prior to the date set for submission of the motion. No memoranda in opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (rec. doc. 7), set for submission on February 27, 2019, has been filed, timely or otherwise. Accordingly, the motion is deemed to be unopposed, and further, it appearing to the Court that the motion has merit,
Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (rec. doc. 7) should be and is hereby GRANTED.
A motion for reconsideration of this order based on the appropriate Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, if any, must be filed within 15 days. The motion for reconsideration must be accompanied by an opposition memorandum to the original motion. Because a motion for reconsideration would not have been necessary had a timely opposition memorandum been filed, the costs incurred in connection with the motion, including attorney's fees, will be assessed against the party moving for reconsideration. See Rules 16, 83, Fed. R. Civ. P. A statement conforming to Local Rule 54.2 shall be submitted by those parties desiring to be awarded attorney's fees in advance of the noticed submission date of the motion for reconsideration.
Source: Leagle
