Smith v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc., 18-14317. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190311a16
Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 08, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 08, 2019
Summary: ORDER CARL BARBIER , District Judge . The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation, hereby ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 8) and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the BP Parties' Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 4) is GRANTED and Pla
Summary: ORDER CARL BARBIER , District Judge . The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation, hereby ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 8) and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the BP Parties' Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 4) is GRANTED and Plai..
More
ORDER
CARL BARBIER, District Judge.
The Court, having considered the complaint, the record, the applicable law, the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge, and the failure of any party to file an objection to the Report and Recommendation, hereby ACCEPTS the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 8) and adopts it as its opinion in this matter. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the BP Parties' Motion to Dismiss (Rec. Doc. 4) is GRANTED and Plaintiff Debra C. Smith's complaint is DISMISSED IN PART as to her claim of legal blindness, without prejudice to refiling once all BELO suit preconditions are met. Plaintiff's claims for chronic conjunctivitis and chronic dry eye syndrome are not dismissed.
Source: Leagle
