SCOTT v. HUBERT, 08-11-FJP-SCR. (2012)
Court: District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20120724905
Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 23, 2012
Latest Update: Jul. 23, 2012
Summary: OPINION FRANK J. POLOZOLA, District Judge. After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report 1 to which an objection was filed by counsel for plaintiff 2 and counsel for the State of Louisiana 3 : The Court finds that petitioner's claim that his guilty plea to aggravated burglary was not knowing and voluntary is denied. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings on petitioner's sexual bat
Summary: OPINION FRANK J. POLOZOLA, District Judge. After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report 1 to which an objection was filed by counsel for plaintiff 2 and counsel for the State of Louisiana 3 : The Court finds that petitioner's claim that his guilty plea to aggravated burglary was not knowing and voluntary is denied. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings on petitioner's sexual batt..
More
OPINION
FRANK J. POLOZOLA, District Judge.
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report1 to which an objection was filed by counsel for plaintiff2 and counsel for the State of Louisiana3:
The Court finds that petitioner's claim that his guilty plea to aggravated burglary was not knowing and voluntary is denied. This matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings on petitioner's sexual battery trial ineffective assistance of counsel claim.
FootNotes
1. Rec. Doc. No. 49.
2. Rec. Doc. No. 50.
3. Rec. Doc. No. 51.
Source: Leagle
