Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Gray, 15-53-SDD-EWD. (2019)

Court: District Court, M.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20190905a06 Visitors: 11
Filed: Sep. 03, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2019
Summary: ORDER ERIN WILDER-DOOMES , Magistrate Judge . Before the court is a Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. 2255 1 and Addendum in Support of Motion to Vacate, 2 filed by Petitioner Chanel Pamela Gray ("Gray"). Gray brings 15 claims, including a claim that her trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file an appeal despite her request. 3 The Court will conduct an evidentiary hearing on the limited issue of whether Gray instructed her counsel to file a notice of appeal. The failure to fil
More

ORDER

Before the court is a Motion to Vacate under 28 U.S.C. § 22551 and Addendum in Support of Motion to Vacate,2 filed by Petitioner Chanel Pamela Gray ("Gray"). Gray brings 15 claims, including a claim that her trial counsel was ineffective in failing to file an appeal despite her request.3 The Court will conduct an evidentiary hearing on the limited issue of whether Gray instructed her counsel to file a notice of appeal.

The failure to file a requested notice of appeal constitutes ineffective assistance of counsel regardless of whether the appeal would have merit,4 even if there is an otherwise valid waiver of appeal.5 As there is a lack of conclusive evidence in the record of whether Gray requested that her trial counsel file an appeal, and as the Government concedes that an evidentiary hearing on this issue may be necessary,6 the Court will hold an evidentiary hearing on the limited issue of whether Gray instructed her trial attorney to file a notice of appeal. The Court must also appoint counsel for Gray because an evidentiary hearing is necessary.7

IT IS ORDERED that an evidentiary hearing is scheduled for October 2, 2019 at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 5 before Magistrate Judge Erin Wilder-Doomes on the issue of whether Petitioner Chanel Pamela Gray instructed her trial counsel to file a notice of appeal. The United States Marshals Service is ordered to produce Petitioner Chanel Pamela Gray for the hearing.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is referred to the Office of the Federal Public Defender for the purpose of either accepting an appointment to represent the Petitioner in connection with this issue or recommending counsel for such appointment from the CJA panel. The Petitioner is placed on notice that she may be required to contribute to the cost of this representation depending on circumstances to be determined at a later date.

FootNotes


1. R. Doc. 70.
2. R. Doc. 72.
3. See R. Doc. 70, p. 7 and R. Doc. 70-1, p. 12.
4. Roe v. Flores-Ortega, 528 U.S. 470, 477 (2000).
5. See United States v. Tapp, 491 F.3d 263, 266 (5th Cir. 2007).
6. R. Doc. 86, p. 10.
7. United States v. Vasquez, 7 F.3d. 81 (5th Cir. 1993) (holding the appointment of counsel is mandatory, if an evidentiary hearing is needed in a habeas corpus action). USM
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer