United States v. Frank, 10-27-JWD-EWD. (2020)
Court: District Court, M.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20200316b81
Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 13, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2020
Summary: OPINION JOHN W. DeGRAVELLES , District Judge . After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 173) dated February 27, 2020, to which objection was filed (Doc. 175); IT IS ORDERED that that Petitioner's Motions to Vacate, Set Aside and Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Docs. 154 & 160) are DENIED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for leave of Court Motion
Summary: OPINION JOHN W. DeGRAVELLES , District Judge . After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 173) dated February 27, 2020, to which objection was filed (Doc. 175); IT IS ORDERED that that Petitioner's Motions to Vacate, Set Aside and Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (Docs. 154 & 160) are DENIED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for leave of Court Motion f..
More
OPINION
JOHN W. DeGRAVELLES, District Judge.
After independently reviewing the entire record in this case and for the reasons set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Report (Doc. 173) dated February 27, 2020, to which objection was filed (Doc. 175);
IT IS ORDERED that that Petitioner's Motions to Vacate, Set Aside and Correct Sentence under 28 U.S.C. §2255 (Docs. 154 & 160) are DENIED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for leave of Court Motion for "Stay" is DENIED as moot (Doc. 175). The Court also construes record document 175 as an objection to the report and recommendation (Doc. 173), and the objection is OVERRULED.
Source: Leagle
