AMOS v. KEITH, 6:15-cv-0545. (2015)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20160122c87
Visitors: 6
Filed: Dec. 29, 2015
Latest Update: Dec. 29, 2015
Summary: JUDGMENT RICHARD T. HAIK, Sr. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record; IT IS ORDERED that the instant petition for habeas corpus be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred by the provisions of 28 U.S.
Summary: JUDGMENT RICHARD T. HAIK, Sr. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record; IT IS ORDERED that the instant petition for habeas corpus be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred by the provisions of 28 U.S.C..
More
JUDGMENT
RICHARD T. HAIK, Sr., District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record, determining that the findings are correct under the applicable law, and considering the objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;
IT IS ORDERED that the instant petition for habeas corpus be DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as time barred by the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d).
Source: Leagle
