CUNNINGHAM v. U.S., 13-1156. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20160426820
Visitors: 8
Filed: Apr. 05, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 05, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, Jr. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record and a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that The Motion to Dismiss [doc. 23] is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's constitutional claims and the
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, Jr. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record and a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that The Motion to Dismiss [doc. 23] is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's constitutional claims and the c..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES T. TRIMBLE, Jr., District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent review of the record and a de novo determination of the issues, and consideration of the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that The Motion to Dismiss [doc. 23] is GRANTED with respect to plaintiff's constitutional claims and the claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
THUS DONE AND SIGNED.
Source: Leagle
