Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HARRIS v. CITY OF BASTROP, 15-0761. (2016)

Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20160720a30 Visitors: 1
Filed: Jul. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 19, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling, IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to amend, contained in his memorandum in opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED. Plaintiff has 14 days from the date of this Judgment to file an amended Complaint asserting a false arrest claim. IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 11] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED
More

JUDGMENT

For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling,

IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion to amend, contained in his memorandum in opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 14] is GRANTED. Plaintiff has 14 days from the date of this Judgment to file an amended Complaint asserting a false arrest claim.

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 11] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. To the extent Defendants move for summary judgment on Plaintiff's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 municipal liability claims, 42 U.S.C. § 1985 conspiracy claim, and intentional infliction of emotional distress claim under Louisiana law, their motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Defendants' motion is otherwise DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff has ten days from the date of this Ruling to file an opposition memorandum to the Court's sua sponte notice of intent to dismiss his claims against the Bastrop Police Department.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer