HENDERSON v. OFFICE DEPOT, INC., 15-2907. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20161114n30
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 10, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 10, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Office Depot, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Purs
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Office Depot, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursu..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, together with the written objections thereto filed with this Court, and, after a de novo review of the record, finding that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is correct and that judgment as recommended therein is warranted,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Office Depot, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) [Doc. No. 27] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Plaintiff asserts claims under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1985 and 1986, the motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion is otherwise DENIED.
Source: Leagle
