Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Busby v. Palmer, 3:17-0494. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20170719c42 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 18, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [Doc. No. 19], finding that the Magistrate Judge correctly stated and applied the law, and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] is CONVERTED to a Motion for a More Definitive Statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1
More

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein [Doc. No. 19], finding that the Magistrate Judge correctly stated and applied the law, and noting the lack of objections to the Report and Recommendation,

IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 9] is CONVERTED to a Motion for a More Definitive Statement pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). The converted motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The motion is GRANTED to the extent that Defendant moves for a more definite statement regarding "when" and "where" the allegedly fraudulent statements were made. The motion is otherwise DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs must amend their Complaint within thirty (30) days of the date of this Judgment to allege their fraud claims with more particularity. If Plaintiffs fail to do so, their fraud claims will be dismissed.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer