Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Actos (Pioglitazone) Products Liability Litigation, 6:11-md-2299. (2017)

Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana Number: infdco20170911576 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jul. 25, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 25, 2017
Summary: RECOMMENDATION ON REQUEST FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS PATRICK J. HANNA , Magistrate Judge . This Court having reviewed the Request for Distribution of Funds for services rendered by Arsement, Redd & Morella, LLC for the period April, May and June 2017 submitted by Gary J. Russo, Special Master on July 18, 2017, and any and all objections received, I recommend to the Court that the Request be: Paid _____ Paid, with modifications, for the reasons found in the Memorandum Ruling filed of ev
More

RECOMMENDATION ON REQUEST FOR DISTRIBUTION OF FUNDS

This Court having reviewed the Request for Distribution of Funds for services rendered by Arsement, Redd & Morella, LLC for the period April, May and June 2017 submitted by Gary J. Russo, Special Master on July 18, 2017, and any and all objections received, I recommend to the Court that the Request be:

Paid _____ Paid, with modifications, for the reasons found in the Memorandum Ruling filed of even date herewith. _____ Denied, for the reasons found in the Memorandum Ruling filed of even date herewith.

IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE "CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER: JOINT EXPENSES (REC. DOC. 1906), ANY PARTY OBJECTING TO THIS RECOMMENDATION SHALL SUBMIT OBJECTIONS, IN WRITING, DIRECTLY TO JUDGE DOHERTY'S CHAMBERS — AND SHALL NOT FILE THE OBJECTION INTO THE RECORD — NO LATER THAN FOURTEEN (14) DAYS AFTER THIS RECOMMENDATION IS ENTERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer