Credeur v. St. Charles Gaming Company, LLC, 2:16-CV-566. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180307773
Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 22, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2018
Summary: ORDER DEE D. DRELL , District Judge . For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent ( de novo ) review of the record, noting the absence of any objections, and having determined that the findings and the recommendations are correct under the applicable law; it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to
Summary: ORDER DEE D. DRELL , District Judge . For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent ( de novo ) review of the record, noting the absence of any objections, and having determined that the findings and the recommendations are correct under the applicable law; it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to ..
More
ORDER
DEE D. DRELL, District Judge.
For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after an independent (de novo) review of the record, noting the absence of any objections, and having determined that the findings and the recommendations are correct under the applicable law; it is hereby
ORDERED that the defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 13) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the defendant's Motion to Seal (Doc. 14) is DENIED. The defendant shall refile the subject documents with appropriate redactions pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 within seven (7) days from the date of this Order.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's Motion for Hearing (Doc. 15) is DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
