Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC v. Calls Plus, Inc., 6:16-CV-1624. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180319730
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 16, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after a de novo review of the record including the objections and responses to the objections, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss Complaint in Intervention Under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Plaintiff
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after a de novo review of the record including the objections and responses to the objections, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss Complaint in Intervention Under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Plaintiff ..
More
JUDGMENT
TERRY A. DOUGHTY, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after a de novo review of the record including the objections and responses to the objections, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Motion to Dismiss Complaint in Intervention Under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) filed by Plaintiff is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART AS MOOT. The motion is GRANTED under Rule 12(b)(1) for lack of standing, and Intervenors' Complaint in Intervention is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The motion is otherwise DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
