Curtis v. Michels Corp., 2:17-CV-00562. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180322853
Visitors: 10
Filed: Mar. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 14, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT DONALD E. WALTER , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 24) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a review of the defendant's objections (Rec. Doc. 26), and a de novo determination of the issues, the court determines that the findings are correct under applicable law. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 12) is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FUR
Summary: JUDGMENT DONALD E. WALTER , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 24) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a review of the defendant's objections (Rec. Doc. 26), and a de novo determination of the issues, the court determines that the findings are correct under applicable law. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 12) is hereby GRANTED. IT IS FURT..
More
JUDGMENT
DONALD E. WALTER, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation (Rec. Doc. 24) of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a review of the defendant's objections (Rec. Doc. 26), and a de novo determination of the issues, the court determines that the findings are correct under applicable law. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Rec. Doc. 12) is hereby GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the 33rd Judicial District Court, Allen Parish, Louisiana.
Source: Leagle
