Gipson v. Keith, 1:14-CV-02278. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180404b46
Visitors: 12
Filed: Mar. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that Gipson's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 94) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law; IT IS ORDERED that Gipson's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 94) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (D..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR., District Judge.
For the reasons contained in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, and after independent (de novo) review of the record including the objections filed herein, and having determined that the findings and recommendation are correct under the applicable law;
IT IS ORDERED that Gipson's motion for summary judgment (Doc. 94) is DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 83) is GRANTED, and Gipson's action against LeBlanc and Walker, under both federal and state law, is DENIED AND DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
