Stewart v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 2:17-CV-1122. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180405a39
Visitors: 7
Filed: Apr. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 04, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, [Doc. No. 27], of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record; IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 18], is GRANTED , and the plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rul
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, [Doc. No. 27], of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record; IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 18], is GRANTED , and the plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, [Doc. No. 27], of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, determining that the findings are correct under applicable law, and noting the absence of objections to the Report and Recommendation in the record;
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the defendant's Motion to Dismiss, [Doc. No. 18], is GRANTED, and the plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Source: Leagle
