RULING

ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.

Currently pending before the Court is an application for a temporary restraining order filed by Plaintiff, Transcontinental Gas Pipe Line Company, LLC ("Transco").1 [Doc. No. 3] Pursuant to its application, Transco seeks a temporary restraining order "enjoining defendants from taking any action to terminate, or interfere with, its right to possession of the property in question pending a hearing on its motion for preliminary injunction. . . ."2 Id. at 5. Transco has not satisfied the following requirements for issuance of a temporary restraining order:

1. Transco admits Defendants, to date, have not prohibited Transco from conducting operations on the property, nor demanded Transco vacate the property. [See e.g. Doc. No. 3-1 at 13; Doc. No. 7 at 6]. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 65, "The court may issue a temporary restraining order without written or oral notice to the adverse party or its attorney only if: . . . specific facts in an affidavit or a verified complaint clearly show that immediate and irreparable injury, loss, or damage will result to the movant before the adverse party can be heard in opposition. . . ." Id. at § (b)(1)(A) (emphasis added). As Transco admits Defendants have not denied it access to the property, it has not shown, through the affidavits submitted, that it will incur any loss before Defendants can be heard in opposition.

2. Transco has not complied with Fed. R. Civ. P. 65(b)(1)(B), as its attorney has not certified in writing "any efforts made to give notice and the reasons why it should not be required." See also Local Rule 65.1.

3. Transco has not provided a proposed order, as required by Local Rules 7.4.1 and 58.1.

In light of the above, the application for temporary restraining order is DENIED without prejudice to Transco's right to reurge its motion after curing the above deficiencies.3