Parish of Cameron v. Auster Oil & Gas, Inc., 16-0530. (2018)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20180510a98
Visitors: 4
Filed: May 09, 2018
Latest Update: May 09, 2018
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 98], to the extent adopted by this Court after a de novo review of the entire record, including the objections and responses, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling, IT IS ORDERED that the Motions and Supplemental Motions to Remand [Doc. Nos. 18, 27, 52 & 54] filed by Plaintiff Parish of Cameron and Intervenor the State of L
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 98], to the extent adopted by this Court after a de novo review of the entire record, including the objections and responses, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling, IT IS ORDERED that the Motions and Supplemental Motions to Remand [Doc. Nos. 18, 27, 52 & 54] filed by Plaintiff Parish of Cameron and Intervenor the State of Lo..
More
JUDGMENT
TERRY A. DOUGHTY, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge [Doc. No. 98], to the extent adopted by this Court after a de novo review of the entire record, including the objections and responses, and for those additional reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling,
IT IS ORDERED that the Motions and Supplemental Motions to Remand [Doc. Nos. 18, 27, 52 & 54] filed by Plaintiff Parish of Cameron and Intervenor the State of Louisiana ex rel. Jeff Landry, Attorney General and through the Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Office of Costal Management, and Louisiana Department of Natural Resources, Thomas F. Harris are GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is hereby instructed to remand this matter to the 38th Judicial District Court, Cameron Parish, Louisiana, forthwith.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the related Motion for Oral Argument [Doc. No. 82], Motion for Leave to File Notice of Supplemental Authority [Doc. No. 84], and Motion for Status Conference [Doc. No. 85] as DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
